Awesome
I liked this professor because he was a good lecturer who has the best pacing in class. Exams account for 84 percent of the class, but you are only scored on the best three exams out of four. The only disappointment I had was that it seemed that I was wasting a lot of time doing arithmetic that a computer program could perform really quickly.
Western Kentucky University - Economics
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Economics
West Virginia University
High School Diploma
Colegio San Carlos
Spanish
English
Bachelor of Applied Science (B.A.Sc.)
Economics and Management Information Systems
Davis and Elkins College
Spanish
PowerPoint
Qualitative Research
SAS
LaTeX
Economics
Higher Education
Public Speaking
Research
Stata
University Teaching
C++
Econometrics
Teaching
Microsoft Word
Statistics
Data Analysis
Matlab
Term Limits
Time Horizons
and Electoral Accountability
George R. Crowley
Term limits have been known to reduce electoral accountability by removing the possibility of reelection
thus affecting economic policy choices (i.e.
the ‘lame duck’ effect). We show that the magnitude and statistical significance of this effect is influenced by the expected length of a future career. By using incumbent age as a proxy for expected career length
we find that the lame-duck effect is statistically observable only among those politicians with long careers ahead. Using data on US governors from 1950 to 2005
we find evidence that the influence of term limits is heterogeneous
primarily influencing young incumbents who hope to have long careers and thus have stronger incentives to remain accountable to voters. Indeed
we find little evidence of a lame-duck effect among older incumbents
suggesting that their already-shortened time horizons may offset the term limit effect.
Term Limits
Time Horizons
and Electoral Accountability
We use household data from the Current Population Survey to calculate how the real value of the so-called \"marriage tax\" or \"marriage subsidy\" in the federal individual income tax has changed over the period 1969 to 2009. We examine three issues: the magnitude of the marriage tax/subsidy and its evolution over time
its effects on the distribution of income (including the effects of different demographic characteristics on the magnitudes and trends)
and the causal factors in its evolution (e.g.
tax changes
demographic changes). We find that the tax treatment of the family has changed significantly over time
from a large average marriage bonus in 1969
to a large marriage tax in much of the 1990s and early 2000s
to a large marriage subsidy since 2003. We also find that the marriage tax varies significantly and systematically by income level
as well as by the number of children in the family
the earnings ratios of the spouses
the race of the family
and the age of the household head. Finally
we find that changes in income and family composition have influenced the magnitudes and trends of marriage taxes and subsidies
but that adjustments in the federal income tax code account for most of the observed changes.
Whither the Marriage Tax
This article provides a more accurate estimate of implicit marginal tax rates (IMTRs) faced by low-income households in all fifty states. Complications arising from multiple program participation
regional differences in wage regulations
and cost of living make former generalizations about representative low-income households in a state potentially problematic. Additionally
it is appropriate to account for differences in work requirements by choosing the relevant margin to estimate the IMTR
and these margins vary by state. This article is the first to consider these margins
and
indeed
the author finds significant variation of IMTRs for different states. One of biggest sources of variation is the structure of child care subsidies provisions and cost. However
changes made to initial assumptions causes the estimated rates to vary in unpredictable ways. Given this complicated and unpredictable nature of the variation
researchers should exercise caution when using estimated IMTRs to examine work incentives of welfare programs.
Estimating Implicit Marginal Tax Rates of Welfare Recipients across the US States
In this paper we estimate the impacts on income tax collections of legalizing same-sex marriage. We utilize new individual-level data sources to estimate the federal income tax consequences of legalizing same-sex marriages. These data sources also allow us to estimate the impact of legalization on state income tax collections. We find that 23 states would realize a net fiscal benefit from legalization
while 21 states would experience a decline in revenue. The potential (annual) changes in state tax revenue range from negative $29 million in California to positive $16 million in New York. At the federal level
our estimates suggest an overall reduction in revenues
ranging from a potential loss of $187 million to $580 million. Overall
we find that the federal and state impacts are quite modest. We also find that our estimates are only marginally affected by alternative assumptions about how many same-sex couples will choose to marry and which partner will claim any children for tax deduction purposes.
Revisiting the Income Tax Effects of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriages
Analysts of survey data suggest that blacks are more disapproving of homosexuality than whites. We empirically test this hypothesis by analyzing the influence of homosexuals on house prices in neighborhoods with varying concentrations of black residents. Indeed
we find that an additional homosexual couple is associated with a decrease in house prices in predominantly black neighborhoods
but an increase in house prices in predominantly white neighborhoods. This implies that a small part of the price differential between black neighborhoods and white neighborhoods may bevdue to prejudicial attitudes towards homosexuals.
Are Black Neighborhoods Less Welcoming to Homosexuals than White Neighborhoods?
This paper examines how merit-based tuition assistance policies implemented by a growing number of states affect one important dimension of college graduate behavior: the conditional probability of working in the state. Using a restricted-use administrative dataset for West Virginia
we find that
conditional on in-state enrollment and graduation
graduates that received merit aid are less likely than similar non-recipient graduates to work at establishments in the state. These results suggest that the positive influences of merit aid in West Virginia on human capital accumulation stemming from increased in-state college enrollment and graduation are dampened by the locational decisions of the recipients after graduation
Merit-Based College Tuition Assistance and the Conditional Probability of In-state Work
Anti-discrimination laws on the basis of sexual orientation have been adopted by many states to counteract perceived discrimination in the labor market. However
we find the evidence of earnings disparities between homosexual and heterosexual men to be extremely sensitive to the choice of reference group. Relative to married heterosexual men
gay men earn less
and
over time
anti-discriminatory laws lessen this gap. Relative to unmarried
coupled heterosexual men
however
gay men experience similar levels of earnings. The choice of reference group leads to opposite conclusions regarding the effectiveness and necessity of an anti-discriminatory law for homosexual men
which highlights the need to construct reference groups with care. We also find that homosexual women experience similar earnings to their heterosexual female counterparts
and the law has no effect on these relative wages.
Revisiting Evidence of Labor Market Discrimination against Homosexuals and the Effects of Anti-Discriminatory Laws
Leguizamon
Tulane University
WVU John Chambers College of Business and Economics
West Virginia University
Hochschule Fulda
University of Applied Sciences
Vanderbilt University
Western Kentucky University
Inter-American Development Bank
Assistant Professor of Economics
Bowling Green Area
KY
Western Kentucky University
Provided research assistance
data analysis
and survey analysis for a project aiming to reveal the actual individual access to Microfinance in developing countries in Latin America.
Intern
Washington D.C. Metro Area
Inter-American Development Bank
Morgantown
WV
Assisted with local economic forecast. \n\nParticipated in the writing of state economic reports
including some on the impact of Higher Education investments
to be read by the legislature and other general audiences.
Graduate Research Assistant- Bureau of Business and Economic Research (BBER)
WVU John Chambers College of Business and Economics
New Orleans
LA
Academic research regarding the political influence on state and local finances. Teach an undergraduate and Master's class on the Economics of Taxation.
Teaching Fellow
Tulane University
Taught Business Ethics and Corporate Governance for the Master's in International Business program.
Visiting Lecturer
Fulda Area
Germany
Hochschule Fulda
University of Applied Sciences
Taught principles and intermediate courses in economics.
West Virginia University
Vanderbilt University
Senior Lecturer
Economics Department
Greater Nashville Area
TN
The following profiles may or may not be the same professor: