Good
This class was a very interesting one. We had field trips at the zoo which I really enjoyed. Grades mostly come from the project and three test. Tests are pretty easy as long as you read the power points and chapters and show up to class. As long as you follow instructions, project would be super easy as well. You are guaranteed an A if you do these. I would honestly recommend this class.
Awful
I took Learning and Motivation for credit because I heard it was easy. However, it is not. The class of Professor Foerder was hard. He will just read straight from the power point. Also, he's not accessible outside the class. His exams do cover a lot and were hard. He will teach and act as if this isn't a 3000 level class. I won't recommend this professor to any students.
University of Tennessee Chattanooga - Psychology
French
Ph.D.
Biopsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience
research focus: Animal Behavior
MA
Psychology focus on Animal Behavior and Conservation
Sigma Xi
the Science Research Society
Parsippany Hills High School
Tufts University
BA
Psychology
Drama
3 Ps - Drama Honor Society
Staten Island Zoo
Wildlife Conservation Society
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Hunter College
Central Park Zoo
Bronx Zoo
Bird keeper.
Bronx Zoo
Intern
Central Park Zoo
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Assistant professor in the psychology department teaching comparative cognition
cognitive processes
and research methods.
Assistant Professor
Chattanooga
Tennessee Area
Presents puppet theatre for adult and family audiences
The Puppetry of Preston Foerder
Hunter College
•\tInstructor at Hunter College:\n\tEthology-Animal Behavior (PSYCH 225)
Fall 2011
Spring 2012.\n\tLearning Theory (PSYCH 350)
Fall 2011
Spring 2012.\n\tEvolution and Behavior (PSYCH 160)
Spring & Fall 2010
Spring 2011.\n\tSocial Psychology (PSYCH 230)
Fall 2009
Spring 2011. \n\tIntroduction to Psychology (PSYCH 100)
6 semesters
Fall 2006 – Fall 2010. \n•\tTeaching assistant for Introduction to Psychology (PSYCH 100)
Experimental Psychology (PSYCH 250)
Experimental Social Psychology (PSYCH 249)
Statistical Methods in Psychology 2 (doctoral level) (PSYCH 706)
and Evolution and Behavior (PSYCH 160).\n•\tGuest lecturer for Animal Behavior and Conservation (PSYCH 717) and Cognitive Processes (PSYCH 270).
Graduate Assistant
Greater New York City Area
Wildlife Conservation Society
Staten Island Zoo
Social Psychology
Microsoft Office
Cognition
Animal Behavior
Psychology
Research
Grant Writing
Theatre
Public Speaking
Student Affairs
Performing Arts
Creative Writing
Teaching
Comparative Cognition
Insightful Problem Solving in an Asian Elephant
Diana Reiss
Donald E. Moore III
Tony Barthel
Marie Galloway
The “aha” moment or the sudden arrival of the solution to a problem is a common human experience. Spontaneous problem solving without evident trial and error behavior in humans and other animals has been referred to as insight. Surprisingly
elephants
thought to be highly intelligent
have failed to exhibit insightful problem solving in previous cognitive studies. We tested whether three Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) would use sticks or other objects to obtain food items placed out-of-reach and overhead. Without prior trial and error behavior
a 7-year-old male Asian elephant showed spontaneous problem solving by moving a large plastic cube
on which he then stood
to acquire the food. In further testing he showed behavioral flexibility
using this technique to reach other items and retrieving the cube from various locations to use as a tool to acquire food. In the cube's absence
he generalized this tool utilization technique to other objects and
when given smaller objects
stacked them in an attempt to reach the food. The elephant's overall behavior was consistent with the definition of insightful problem solving. Previous failures to demonstrate this ability in elephants may have resulted not from a lack of cognitive ability but from the presentation of tasks requiring trunk-held sticks as potential tools
thereby interfering with the trunk's use as a sensory organ to locate the targeted food.
Insightful Problem Solving in an Asian Elephant
Donald E. Moore
Martin Chodorow
Animals in aggregations such as herds
schools
flocks
or colonies tend to synchronize their behaviour with each other for food acquisition and predator detection. Different species of captive penguins
when housed communally
intermingle more than in their natural habitat. Wild penguins typically divide themselves into separate colonies by species. We predicted that penguins would synchronize their behaviour more with conspecifics rather than interspecifically in a mixed-species zoo exhibit. The subjects were 65 penguins of two different species
chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarctica) and gentoo (Pygoscelis papua) in the Central Park Zoo
New York
NY
USA. Using instantaneous scan sampling
359 video scans were taken over 10 days. Scans were analysed for nine different categories of behaviour for both species. Intra-species synchrony scores were calculated using the Kappa coefficient of agreement
and inter-species synchrony was measured by computing cross-correlations. As predicted
overall synchrony was significantly greater within both species of penguins than for randomly aggregated data representing mixed groups. There was also significantly less synchrony between species than between randomly mixed data for six of the nine behaviour categories. The pattern of results indicates that the penguins had organized by behaviour into separate species-specific colonies within the enclosure. They maintained species separation through behavioural synchrony despite the restrictions imposed by captivity.
Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
Foerder
The Puppetry of Preston Foerder