Nathan Sanders

 Nathan Sanders

Nathan Sanders

  • Courses0
  • Reviews0

Biography

University of Toronto St. George Campus - Linguistics


Resume

  • 1996

    Linguistics Society of America

    French

    American Sign Language

    German

    MA

    PhD

    Dissertation title: Opacity and Sound Change in the Polish Lexicon\nCommittee: Jaye Padgett (advisor)

    Junko Ito

    Armin Mester

    Caro Struijke

    Linguistics

    GSA

  • 1992

    SB

    Mathematics

    minor in Linguistics

    LMF

    LSC

    GaMIT

  • Phonetics

    Qualitative Research

    Historical Linguistics

    Teaching

    Science

    Curriculum Design

    Linguistics

    Tutoring

    Higher Education

    Writing

    Academic Writing

    LaTeX

    R

    Phonology

    Editing

    Curriculum Development

    Research

    Quantitative Research

    University Teaching

    Mathematics

    Signs of efficiency: Maintaining torso stability affects sign language vocabulary

    Donna Jo Napoli

    Many properties of languages

    including sign languages

    are not uniformly distributed among items in the lexicon. Some of this nonuniformity can be accounted for by appeal to articulatory ease

    with easier articulations being overrepresented in the lexicon in comparison to more difficult articulations. The literature on ease of articulation deals only with the active effort internal to the articulation itself. We note the existence of a previously unstudied aspect of articulatory ease

    which we call reactive effort: the effort of resisting incidental movement that has been induced by an articulation elsewhere in the body. For example

    reactive effort is needed to resist incidental twisting and rocking of the torso induced by path movement of the manual articulators in sign languages. We argue that

    as part of a general linguistic drive to reduce articulatory effort

    reactive effort should have a significant effect on the relative frequency in the lexicon of certain types of path movements. We support this argument with evidence from Italian Sign Language

    Sri Lankan Sign Language

    and Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language

    evidence that cannot be explained solely by appeal to constraints on bimanual coordination. As the first exploration of the linguistic role of reactive effort

    this work contributes not only to the developing field of sign language phonetics

    but to our understanding of phonetics in general

    adding to a growing body of functionalist literature which shows that some linguistic patterns emerge from more fundamental factors of the physical world.\n\nThis article is adapted from our longer

    more technical 2016 article \"Reactive effort as a factor that shapes sign language lexicons\" in Language 92(2) (p.275–297).

    Signs of efficiency: Maintaining torso stability affects sign language vocabulary

    Donna Jo Napoli

    Many properties of languages

    including sign languages

    are not uniformly distributed among items in the lexicon. Some of this nonuniformity can be accounted for by appeal to articulatory ease

    with easier articulations being overrepresented in the lexicon in comparison to more difficult articulations. The literature on ease of articulation deals only with the active effort internal to the articulation itself. We note the existence of a previously unstudied aspect of articulatory ease

    which we call reactive effort: the effort of resisting incidental movement that has been induced by an articulation elsewhere in the body. For example

    reactive effort is needed to resist incidental twisting and rocking of the torso induced by path movement of the manual articulators in sign languages. We argue that

    as part of a general linguistic drive to reduce articulatory effort

    reactive effort should have a significant effect on the relative frequency in the lexicon of certain types of path movements. We support this argument with evidence from Italian Sign Language

    Sri Lankan Sign Language

    and Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language

    evidence that cannot be explained solely by appeal to constraints on bimanual coordination. As the first exploration of the linguistic role of reactive effort

    this work contributes not only to the developing field of sign language phonetics

    but also to our understanding of phonetics in general

    adding to a growing body of functionalist literature showing that some linguistic patterns emerge from more fundamental factors of the physical world.

    Reactive effort as a factor that shapes sign language lexicons

    Donna Jo Napoli

    Rebecca Wright

    Spoken language has a well-known drive for ease of articulation

    which Kirchner (1998

    2004) analyzes as reduction of the total magnitude of all biomechanical forces involved. We extend Kirchner’s insights from vocal articulation to manual articulation

    with a focus on joint usage

    and we discuss ways that articulatory ease might be realized in sign languages. In particular

    moving more joints and/or joints more proximal to the torso results in greater mass being moved

    and thus more articulatory force being expended

    than moving fewer joints or moving more distal joints. We predict that in casual conversation

    where articulatory ease is prized

    moving fewer joints should be favored over moving more

    and moving distal joints should be favored over moving proximal joints. We report on the results of our study of the casual signing of fluent signers of American Sign Language

    which confirm our predictions: in comparison to citation forms of signs

    the casual variants produced by the signers in our experiment exhibit an overall decrease in average joint usage

    as well as a general preference for more distal articulation than is used in citation form. We conclude that all language

    regardless of modality

    is shaped by a fundamental drive for ease of articulation. Our work advances a cross-modality approach for considering ease of articulation

    develops a potentially important vocabulary for describing variations in signs

    and demonstrates that American Sign Language exhibits variation that can be accounted for in terms of ease of articulation. We further suggest that the linguistic drive for ease of articulation is part of a broader tendency for the human body to reduce biomechanical effort in all physical activities.

    On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease

    with a focus on sign languages

    Donna Jo Napoli

    When the arms move in certain ways

    they can cause the torso to twist or rock. Such extraneous torso movement is undesirable

    especially during sign language communication

    when torso position may carry linguistic significance

    so we expend effort to resist it when it is not intended. This so-called \"reactive effort\" has only recently been identified by Sanders and Napoli (2016)

    but their preliminary work on three genetically unrelated languages suggests that the effects of reactive effort can be observed cross-linguistically by examination of sign language lexicons. In particular

    the frequency of different kinds of manual movements in the lexicon correlates with the amount of reactive effort needed to resist movement of the torso. Following this line of research

    we present evidence from 24 sign languages confirming that there is a cross-linguistic preference for minimizing the reactive effort needed to keep the torso stable.

    A cross-linguistic preference for torso stability in the lexicon: Evidence from 24 sign languages

    Constructed languages (purposefully invented languages like Esperanto and Klingon) have long captured the human imagination. They can also be used as pedagogical tools in the linguistics classroom to enhance how certain aspects of linguistics are taught and to broaden the appeal of linguistics as a field. In this article

    I discuss the history and nature of constructed languages and describe various ways I have successfully brought them into use in the classroom. I conclude from the results of my courses that linguists should take a closer look at how they might benefit from similarly enlisting this often criticized hobby into more mainstream use in the linguistics classroom.

    Constructed languages in the classroom

    Nathan

    Sanders

    Haverford College

    Swarthmore College

    University of Toronto

    Williams College

    I taught introduction to linguistics

    phonetics/phonology

    syntax

    semantics

    historical linguistics

    linguistic typology

    advanced research methods

    and the senior research seminar for the Department of Linguistics.

    Visiting Assistant Professor

    Greater Philadelphia Area

    Swarthmore College

    I was coordinator of the Linguistics Program. I designed the entire curriculum from the ground up and taught introduction to linguistics

    phonology

    phonetics

    syntax

    logic/semantics

    historical linguistics

    linguistic typology

    and the senior research seminar.

    Assistant Professor

    Pittsfield

    Massachusetts Area

    Williams College

    Greater Philadelphia Area

    Based at Haverford College

    I taught syntax

    phonetics/phonology

    and introduction to linguistics for the entire Tri-College Department of Linguistics (Haverford College

    Bryn Mawr College

    and Swarthmore College).

    Visiting Assistant Professor

    Haverford College

    Toronto

    Canada Area

    I teach introduction to language

    quantitative methods

    and graduate phonology for the Department of Linguistics.

    Assistant Professor

    Teaching Stream

    University of Toronto