George Mason University - Conflict Analysis
The war of narratives between Trump and Clinton has revealed some deep ideological contrast and personal animosity between two very ambitious presidential candidates. Ironically
the Obama Doctrine remains a catalyst factor in shaping their political and philosophical differences and nuances of America’s future leadership. Clinton’s platform embodies status-quo politics with some possible hawkish amendments of the U.S. foreign policy; whereas Trump’s vision aspires to create radical change and turn the Obama Administration’s policies on their heads. This report analyses the two diverging frameworks of the U.S. foreign policy vis-à-vis six hot issues in the world: the ISIL dilemma
the Syrian crisis
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Iran’s nuclear ambitions
the geo-strategic alliance with the Gulf States
and the Islamic World. It also weighs on America’s hard choice between isolationism and interventionism starting January 20
Clinton versus Trump: Two-Distant Visions for America
Karine Korestelona
Daniel Rothbart
This book explores the issue of civilian devastation in modern warfare
focusing on the complex processes that effectively establish civilians’ identity in times of war. Underpinning the physicality of war’s tumult are structural forces that create landscapes of civilian vulnerability. Such forces operate in four sectors of modern warfare: nationalistic ideology
state-sponsored militaries
global media
and international institutions. Each sector promotes its own constructions of civilian identity in relation to militant combatants: constructions that prove lethal to the civilian noncombatant who lacks political power and decision-making capacity with regards to their own survival.\nCivilians and Modern War provides a critical overview of the plight of civilians in war
examining the political and normative underpinnings of the decisions
actions
policies
and practices of major sectors of war. The contributors seek to undermine the ‘tunnelling effect’ of the militaristic framework regarding the experiences of noncombatants.
Civilians and Modern War: Armed Conflict and the Ideology of War
Mohammed
Middle East Broadcasting Networks
United Nations
George Mason University
BBC
U.S. Department of State
Voice of America
Washington DC
Assignment Senior Editor
Middle East Broadcasting Networks
Arlington/Fairfax. VA
Professor
George Mason University
Program Writer and Host
London
United Kingdom
BBC
Member of the Panel of Experts
Greater New York City Area
United Nations
Washington DC
News Broadcaster
Voice of America
Reviewer
Washington D.C. Metro Area
U.S. Department of State
Affiliate Researcher
The Moroccan Interdisciplinary Center for Strategic and International Studies (CMIESI)
Affiliate Researcher
Center for Narrative and Conflict Resolution (CNCR)
Affiliate Researcher
Centre for Studies and Research in Social Sciences (CSRSS)
English
Arabic
French
Annual Award for Excellence in Programming
Voice of America
Meritorious Honor Award
International Broadcasting Bureau
John Burton Award
George Mason University
The Voice of America Language Service Broadcasting Award
Voice of America
The James H. Laue Memorial Award
George Mason University
George Mason University
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
Université Mohamed V Rabat-Agdal
Bachelor’s Degree
Political Science and Government
International Relations and Affairs
Master’s Degree
The Palestinian Media at the Crossroads: Challenges and Expectations
Most political elite and pundits in the United States have been bewildered by the growing popularity of Republican candidate Donald Trump despite his controversial statements about Mexican immigrants
Muslims
refugees
women
and other minorities. He remains a polarizing figure within the uncharted territory of Islamophobia
xenophobia
racism
and misogyny. This report showcases the socio-economic and cultural dynamics which have paved the way for the rise of Trump as he has outperformed 16 other Republican opponents. It makes six propositions about the driving force behind what can be coined as a new doctrine of Trumpism.
Donald Trump: The Rise of Right-wing Politics in America
Political sociology has struggled with predicting the next turn of transformation in the MENA countries after the 2011 Uprisings. Arab activists did not articulate explicitly any modalities of their desired system
although their slogans ushered to a fully-democratic society. These unguided Uprisings showcase an open-ended freedom-to question after Arabs underwent their freedom-from struggle from authoritarianism. The new conflicts in Egypt
Syria
Yemen
and Libya have fragmented shar’iya (legitimacy) into distinct conceptualizations: “revolutionary legitimacy
” “electoral legitimacy
” “legitimacy of the street
” and “consensual legitimacy.” This volume examines whether the Uprisings would introduce a replica of the European Enlightenment or rather stimulate an Arab/Islamic awakening with its own cultural specificity and political philosophy. By placing Immanuel Kant in Tahrir Square
this book adopts a comparative analysis of two enlightenment projects: one Arab
still under construction
with possible progression toward modernity or regression toward neo-authoritarianism
and one European
shaped by the past two centuries. \n\nMohammed D. Cherkaoui and the contributing authors use a hybrid theoretical framework drawing on three tanwiri (enlightenment) philosophers from different eras: Ibn Rushd
known in the west as Averroes (the twelfth century)
Immanuel Kant (the eighteenth century)
and Mohamed Abed Al-Jabri (the twentieth century). The authors propose a few projections about the outcome of the competition between an Islamocracy vision and what Cherkaoui terms as a Demoslamic vision
since it implies the Islamist movements’ flexibility to reconcile their religious absolutism with the prerequisites of liberal democracy.
What is Enlightenment? Continuity or Rupture in the Wake of the Arab Uprisings