Mohammed Cherkaoui

 Mohammed Cherkaoui

Mohammed D. Cherkaoui

  • Courses4
  • Reviews10

Biography

George Mason University - Conflict Analysis


Resume

  • 2017.

    The war of narratives between Trump and Clinton has revealed some deep ideological contrast and personal animosity between two very ambitious presidential candidates. Ironically

    the Obama Doctrine remains a catalyst factor in shaping their political and philosophical differences and nuances of America’s future leadership. Clinton’s platform embodies status-quo politics with some possible hawkish amendments of the U.S. foreign policy; whereas Trump’s vision aspires to create radical change and turn the Obama Administration’s policies on their heads. This report analyses the two diverging frameworks of the U.S. foreign policy vis-à-vis six hot issues in the world: the ISIL dilemma

    the Syrian crisis

    the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

    Iran’s nuclear ambitions

    the geo-strategic alliance with the Gulf States

    and the Islamic World. It also weighs on America’s hard choice between isolationism and interventionism starting January 20

    Clinton versus Trump: Two-Distant Visions for America

    Karine Korestelona

    Daniel Rothbart

    This book explores the issue of civilian devastation in modern warfare

    focusing on the complex processes that effectively establish civilians’ identity in times of war. Underpinning the physicality of war’s tumult are structural forces that create landscapes of civilian vulnerability. Such forces operate in four sectors of modern warfare: nationalistic ideology

    state-sponsored militaries

    global media

    and international institutions. Each sector promotes its own constructions of civilian identity in relation to militant combatants: constructions that prove lethal to the civilian noncombatant who lacks political power and decision-making capacity with regards to their own survival.\nCivilians and Modern War provides a critical overview of the plight of civilians in war

    examining the political and normative underpinnings of the decisions

    actions

    policies

    and practices of major sectors of war. The contributors seek to undermine the ‘tunnelling effect’ of the militaristic framework regarding the experiences of noncombatants.

    Civilians and Modern War: Armed Conflict and the Ideology of War

    Mohammed

    Middle East Broadcasting Networks

  • 2014

    United Nations

    George Mason University

    BBC

    U.S. Department of State

    Voice of America

    Washington DC

    Assignment Senior Editor

    Middle East Broadcasting Networks

    Arlington/Fairfax. VA

    Professor

    George Mason University

    Program Writer and Host

    London

    United Kingdom

    BBC

    Member of the Panel of Experts

    Greater New York City Area

    United Nations

    Washington DC

    News Broadcaster

    Voice of America

    Reviewer

    Washington D.C. Metro Area

    U.S. Department of State

    Affiliate Researcher

    The Moroccan Interdisciplinary Center for Strategic and International Studies (CMIESI)

    Affiliate Researcher

    Center for Narrative and Conflict Resolution (CNCR)

    Affiliate Researcher

    Centre for Studies and Research in Social Sciences (CSRSS)

    English

    Arabic

    French

    Annual Award for Excellence in Programming

    Voice of America

    Meritorious Honor Award

    International Broadcasting Bureau

    John Burton Award

    George Mason University

    The Voice of America Language Service Broadcasting Award

    Voice of America

    The James H. Laue Memorial Award

    George Mason University

    George Mason University

    Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

    Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution

    Université Mohamed V Rabat-Agdal

    Bachelor’s Degree

    Political Science and Government

    International Relations and Affairs

    Master’s Degree

  • The Palestinian Media at the Crossroads: Challenges and Expectations

    Most political elite and pundits in the United States have been bewildered by the growing popularity of Republican candidate Donald Trump despite his controversial statements about Mexican immigrants

    Muslims

    refugees

    women

    and other minorities. He remains a polarizing figure within the uncharted territory of Islamophobia

    xenophobia

    racism

    and misogyny. This report showcases the socio-economic and cultural dynamics which have paved the way for the rise of Trump as he has outperformed 16 other Republican opponents. It makes six propositions about the driving force behind what can be coined as a new doctrine of Trumpism.

    Donald Trump: The Rise of Right-wing Politics in America

    Political sociology has struggled with predicting the next turn of transformation in the MENA countries after the 2011 Uprisings. Arab activists did not articulate explicitly any modalities of their desired system

    although their slogans ushered to a fully-democratic society. These unguided Uprisings showcase an open-ended freedom-to question after Arabs underwent their freedom-from struggle from authoritarianism. The new conflicts in Egypt

    Syria

    Yemen

    and Libya have fragmented shar’iya (legitimacy) into distinct conceptualizations: “revolutionary legitimacy

    ” “electoral legitimacy

    ” “legitimacy of the street

    ” and “consensual legitimacy.” This volume examines whether the Uprisings would introduce a replica of the European Enlightenment or rather stimulate an Arab/Islamic awakening with its own cultural specificity and political philosophy. By placing Immanuel Kant in Tahrir Square

    this book adopts a comparative analysis of two enlightenment projects: one Arab

    still under construction

    with possible progression toward modernity or regression toward neo-authoritarianism

    and one European

    shaped by the past two centuries. \n\nMohammed D. Cherkaoui and the contributing authors use a hybrid theoretical framework drawing on three tanwiri (enlightenment) philosophers from different eras: Ibn Rushd

    known in the west as Averroes (the twelfth century)

    Immanuel Kant (the eighteenth century)

    and Mohamed Abed Al-Jabri (the twentieth century). The authors propose a few projections about the outcome of the competition between an Islamocracy vision and what Cherkaoui terms as a Demoslamic vision

    since it implies the Islamist movements’ flexibility to reconcile their religious absolutism with the prerequisites of liberal democracy.

    What is Enlightenment? Continuity or Rupture in the Wake of the Arab Uprisings

CONF 210

3.8(5)

online

CONF 399

1(1)