Claremont McKenna College - Government
Vice-President of Education & Editor of The American Mind
Education Management
Matthew J.
Peterson
Greater Los Angeles Area
I am creating a new center designed to support and advance graduate level study of America. I direct the Claremont Institute's Fellowships and continuing educational programming for national leaders and their expansion. I work to increase our role in national discussion and debate over "regime-level" questions, in part through the creation of The American Mind, our new online publication.
Professor of Media, Politics, and Culture
Matthew worked at John Paul the Great Catholic University as a Professor of Media, Politics, and Culture
Vice President of Education
Matthew worked at The Claremont Institute as a Vice President of Education
Editor, The American Mind
The American Mind, a publication of the Claremont Institute, is a forum for vigorous yet civil debate about the ideas that drive the news cycle, our culture, and our politics. The American Mind seeks to recover a distinctively American solution to our current intellectual and political crisis.
William E. Simon Distinguished Visiting Professor
Matthew worked at Pepperdine University School of Public Policy as a William E. Simon Distinguished Visiting Professor
Part-time Lecturer
Taught American government and political theory in the Department of Political Science within the Bellarmine College of Liberal Arts.
Visiting Assistant Professor
Matthew worked at Claremont McKenna College as a Visiting Assistant Professor
M.A., Ph.D.
Political Science: Political Philosophy & American Government
Research Grant, Claremont Graduate University, Spring, 2007; Fall, 2007
Earhart Foundation Fellowship, 2006-2007
Bradley Fellowships, 2002-2006
CGU Fellowship Award, 2002-2005
CGU Research Assistant, 2003-2004
B.A.
Philosophy & Theology; Math & Science; Liberal Arts & Sciences; "Great Books" Program
Great Books program, no electives, no textbooks, all original works (including math and science), all seminar style classes. Degree equivalent to a double major in Philosophy and Theology with a minor in Math and Natural Science.
Claremont Graduate University Dissertation
The dissertation examines the meaning of the public or common good considered as an end or purpose of government in the public debate over the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. Federalists and Anti-Federalists assert that the purpose of government is to both promote the public good and protect individual rights. What did they mean by the “public good” and related phrases? An extended commentary and textual analysis of the published writings of five Federalists (John Dickinson, Oliver Ellsworth, Noah Webster, Tench Coxe, and James Wilson) and five Anti-Federalists (Agrippa, Centinel, Federal Farmer, Impartial Examiner,and Brutus), the dissertation examines the way in which the notion of the public good played a significant part within the larger themes of federalism, representation, liberty versus licentiousness, and union during the ratification period. Neither side’s understanding of the protection of individual rights as the purpose of government forecloses the notion of the public good, but the uniquely federal nature of the Constitution obscures our view of their deeper understanding.The Anti-Federalist view of representation emphasizes that the public good must be truly public without making clear how the public good differs from majority will; the Federalists emphasize the public good must be truly good, the product of sound deliberation. Federalists explicitly claim that liberty is not license, but tied to a common notion of virtue. The Federalists argue that there is a public good for all the states combined and thus the federal government must have supreme power over matters relating to commerce—and commerce is spoken of as intrinsically connected to morality and virtue—for the sake of this national public good. Although the Federalist notion of the public good is limited in scope, remaining partially open as to the final purpose of human beings, it is nonetheless much more than the notion of an interdependent collection of private goods.
The following profiles may or may not be the same professor: