Kimberly Doughty

 KimberlyN. Doughty

Kimberly N. Doughty

  • Courses0
  • Reviews0

Biography

Kimberly N. Doughty is a/an State University Associate Professor in the Board Of Regents department at Southern Connecticut State University

Southern Connecticut State University - Public Health


Resume

  • 2009

    PhD

    Public Health Nutrition

    University of Massachusetts

    Amherst

  • 2007

    Master

    Thesis: Nutrient content of school-bought lunches and lunches brought from home as consumed by high school students.

    Public Health

    Southern Connecticut State University

    Certified Health Education Specialist

    National Commission for Health Education Credentialing

    Inc

  • 2005

    International Society for Research in Human Milk and Lactation (ISRHML)

    Bachelor of Science

    Nutrition and Dietetics

    University of New Haven

  • Nutrition

    SAS

    Health Promotion

    Science

    Research

    Public Health

    Literature Reviews

    Healthcare

    Biostatistics

    Global Health

    SPSS

    Data Analysis

    Epidemiology

    Grant Writing

    Health Education

    Stata

    Qualitative Research

    Statistics

    Teaching

    Nutrition Education

    A cost comparison of more and less nutritious foods in US supermarkets

    Catherine Katz

    Erica Smith

    Jennifer Walker

    Jesse Reynolds

    Judith A. Treu

    David L. Katz

    MD

    MPH

    (first author)

    OBJECTIVE: \n\nThe present study directly compared prices of more and less nutritious foods within given categories in US supermarkets.\n\nDESIGN: \n\nFoods selected from six supermarkets in Jackson County were categorized using the five criteria of the Nutrition Detectives™ (ND) programme and an item-to-item cost comparison was made using posted prices. The nutritional quality of foods was distinguished using the clues of the ND nutrition education programme for elementary-school children and validated using the Overall Nutritional Quality Index.\n\nSETTING: \n\nSupermarkets in Jackson County

    MO

    USA.\n\nSUBJECTS: \n\nNot applicable.\n\nRESULTS: \n\nThe average price of the item for more nutritious foods did not differ significantly from that of less nutritious foods overall ($US 2·89 (sd $US 0·74) v. $US 2·85 (sd $0·68)

    P = 0·76). More nutritious breads cost more than less nutritious breads ($US 3·36 (sd $ US 0·28) v. $US 2·56 (sd $US 0·80

    P = 0·03)

    whereas more nutritious cereals ($US 2·46 (sd $US 0·69) v. $US 3·50 (sd $US 0·30)

    P < 0·01) and cookies ($US 2·76 (sd $US 0·50) v. $US 3·40 (sd $US0·28)

    P < 0·01) cost less.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: \n\nOur findings indicate that it is possible to choose more nutritious foods within many common categories without spending more money and suggest that making small improvements in dietary choices does not invariably cost more.\n

    A cost comparison of more and less nutritious foods in US supermarkets

    David L. Katz

    MD

    MPH

    first author

    Cocoa contains more phenolic antioxidants than most foods. Flavonoids

    including catechin

    epicatechin

    and procyanidins predominate in antioxidant activity. The tricyclic structure of the flavonoids determines antioxidant effects that scavenge reactive oxygen species

    chelate Fe2+ and Cu+

    inhibit enzymes

    and upregulate antioxidant defenses. The epicatechin content of cocoa is primarily responsible for its favorable impact on vascular endothelium via its effect on both acute and chronic upregulation of nitric oxide production. Other cardiovascular effects are mediated through anti-inflammatory effects of cocoa polyphenols

    and modulated through the activity of NF-κB. Antioxidant effects of cocoa may directly influence insulin resistance and

    in turn

    reduce risk for diabetes. Further

    cocoa consumption may stimulate changes in redox-sensitive signaling pathways involved in gene expression and the immune response. Cocoa can protect nerves from injury and inflammation

    protect the skin from oxidative damage from UV radiation in topical preparations

    and have beneficial effects on satiety

    cognitive function

    and mood. As cocoa is predominantly consumed as energy-dense chocolate

    potential detrimental effects of overconsumption exist

    including increased risk of weight gain. Overall

    research to date suggests that the benefits of moderate cocoa or dark chocolate consumption likely outweigh the risks.

    Cocoa and chocolate in human health and disease

    Judith A. Treu

    Suparna Dutta

    John Millet

    Valentine Yanchou Njike

    Yingying Ma (first author)

    OBJECTIVE: \n\nTo determine the effects of daily walnut consumption on endothelial function

    cardiovascular biomarkers

    and anthropometric measures in type 2 diabetic individuals.\n\nRESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: \n\nThis study was a randomized

    controlled

    single-blind

    crossover trial. Twenty-four participants with type 2 diabetes (mean age 58 years; 14 women and 10 men) were randomly assigned to one of the two possible sequence permutations to receive an ad libitum diet enriched with 56 g (366 kcal) walnuts/day and an ad libitum diet without walnuts for 8 weeks. Subjects underwent endothelial function testing (measured as flow-mediated dilatation [FMD]) and assessment of cardiovascular biomarkers before and after each 8-week treatment phase. The primary outcome measure was the change in FMD after 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included changes in plasma lipids

    A1C

    fasting glucose

    insulin sensitivity

    and anthropometric measures.\n\nRESULTS: \n\nEndothelial function significantly improved after consumption of a walnut-enriched ad libitum diet compared with that after consumption of an ad libitum diet without walnuts (2.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.2 +/- 1.6%; P = 0.04). The walnut-enriched diet increased fasting serum glucose and lowered serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol from baseline (10.0 +/- 20.5 mg/dl

    P = 0.04; -9.7 +/- 14.5 mg/dl

    P < 0.01; and -7.7 +/- 10 mg/dl

    P < 0.01

    respectively)

    although these changes were not significant compared with those for an ad libitum diet without walnuts. There were no significant changes in anthropometric measures

    plasma A1C

    and insulin sensitivity.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: \n\nA walnut-enriched ad libitum diet improves endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in type 2 diabetic individuals

    suggesting a potential reduction in overall cardiac risk.\n

    Effects of walnut consumption on endothelial function in type 2 diabetic subjects: a randomized controlled crossover trial.

    Yingying Ma

    Valentine Yanchou Njike

    Jesse Reynolds

    Anna Davidhi (first author)

    Background:  The frequency of unhealthful snacking has increased dramatically over the last three decades. Fruits and nuts have been shown to have positive health effects. No study has investigated the aggregate effects of various fruits combined with nuts in the form of snack bars on cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of this randomised trial was to investigate the effects of a fruit and nut snack bar on anthropomorphic measures

    lipid panel and blood pressure in overweight adults. Methods:  Ninety-four overweight adults (body mass index > 25 kg m(-2) ) were randomly assigned to add two fruit and nut bars totalling 1421.9 kJ (340 kcal) to their ad libitum diet (intervention group) or to continue with their ad libitum diet (control group). Subjects underwent assessment for weight (primary outcome measure)

    as well as waist circumference

    lipid panel and blood pressure (secondary outcome measures)

    before and at the end of the 8-week treatment. Results:  Weight did not change from baseline after snack bar addition compared to controls (P = 0.44). Waist circumference (P = 0.69)

    blood pressure (systolic

    P = 0.83; diastolic

    P = 0.79) and blood lipid panel (total cholesterol

    P = 0.72; high-density lipoprotein

    P = 0.11; total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein

    P = 0.37; triglycerides

    P = 0.89; low-density lipoprotein

    P = 0.81) also did not change from baseline compared to controls. Conclusions:  Two daily fruit and nut bars

    totalling 1421.9 kJ (340 kcal)

    did not cause weight gain. The role of habitual snacking on nutrient dense and satiating foods on both weight over time

    and diet quality

    warrants further study. Satiating snacks rich in fibre may provide a means to weight stabilisation.

    The effect of the addition of daily fruit and nut bars to diet on weight and cardiac risk profile in overweight adults.

    Valentine Y. Njike

    Effects of a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based immersion obesity treatment program for adolescents on weight

    fitness

    and cardiovascular risk factors: a pilot study.

    Valentine Njike

    Judy Treu

    American Journal of Health Promotion

    Advancing School and Community Engagement Now for Disease Prevention (ASCEND): A Quasi-experimental Trial of School-Based Interventions to Prevent Childhood Obesity.

    Lindiwe Sibeko

    Jing Qian

    Katherine W. Reeves

    Barriers to Exclusive Breastfeeding among Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the U.S.

    Doughty

    Sacred Heart University

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    Southern Connecticut State University

    Southern Connecticut State University Department of Public Health

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    One River Grants

    University of Massachusetts Amherst

    Fairfield University

    Fairfield University

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    Derby

    CT

    Designed and implemented evaluation plans for a nutrition guidance intervention in school cafeterias\nAssisted with protocol design for clinical studies\nDrafted original research manuscripts\nAssisted with writing research grant proposals

    Research Associate

    Taught undergraduate and graduate courses in the Department of Public Health

    Southern Connecticut State University

    Research Assistant

    Managed research studies\nImplemented recruitment activities\nWrote and edited research manuscripts \nAssisted with writing and editing portions of grant proposals\nActed as liaison to Griffin Hospital's Institutional Review Board\nDocumented

    collected

    and entered data for analysis\nConducted nutrition analyses on diet records\nProvided nutritional consultation to study participants

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    Research Associate

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    Grant Writer

    One River Grants

    Teaching Assistant

    University of Massachusetts Amherst

    Adjunct Professor

    Sacred Heart University

    Research Scientist

    Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center

    Adjunct Professor

    Southern Connecticut State University Department of Public Health

    American Society for Nutrition (ASN)

    Member