Kimberly N. Doughty is a/an State University Associate Professor in the Board Of Regents department at Southern Connecticut State University
Southern Connecticut State University - Public Health
PhD
Public Health Nutrition
University of Massachusetts
Amherst
Master
Thesis: Nutrient content of school-bought lunches and lunches brought from home as consumed by high school students.
Public Health
Southern Connecticut State University
Certified Health Education Specialist
National Commission for Health Education Credentialing
Inc
International Society for Research in Human Milk and Lactation (ISRHML)
Bachelor of Science
Nutrition and Dietetics
University of New Haven
Nutrition
SAS
Health Promotion
Science
Research
Public Health
Literature Reviews
Healthcare
Biostatistics
Global Health
SPSS
Data Analysis
Epidemiology
Grant Writing
Health Education
Stata
Qualitative Research
Statistics
Teaching
Nutrition Education
A cost comparison of more and less nutritious foods in US supermarkets
Catherine Katz
Erica Smith
Jennifer Walker
Jesse Reynolds
Judith A. Treu
David L. Katz
MD
MPH
(first author)
OBJECTIVE: \n\nThe present study directly compared prices of more and less nutritious foods within given categories in US supermarkets.\n\nDESIGN: \n\nFoods selected from six supermarkets in Jackson County were categorized using the five criteria of the Nutrition Detectives™ (ND) programme and an item-to-item cost comparison was made using posted prices. The nutritional quality of foods was distinguished using the clues of the ND nutrition education programme for elementary-school children and validated using the Overall Nutritional Quality Index.\n\nSETTING: \n\nSupermarkets in Jackson County
MO
USA.\n\nSUBJECTS: \n\nNot applicable.\n\nRESULTS: \n\nThe average price of the item for more nutritious foods did not differ significantly from that of less nutritious foods overall ($US 2·89 (sd $US 0·74) v. $US 2·85 (sd $0·68)
P = 0·76). More nutritious breads cost more than less nutritious breads ($US 3·36 (sd $ US 0·28) v. $US 2·56 (sd $US 0·80
P = 0·03)
whereas more nutritious cereals ($US 2·46 (sd $US 0·69) v. $US 3·50 (sd $US 0·30)
P < 0·01) and cookies ($US 2·76 (sd $US 0·50) v. $US 3·40 (sd $US0·28)
P < 0·01) cost less.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: \n\nOur findings indicate that it is possible to choose more nutritious foods within many common categories without spending more money and suggest that making small improvements in dietary choices does not invariably cost more.\n
A cost comparison of more and less nutritious foods in US supermarkets
David L. Katz
MD
MPH
first author
Cocoa contains more phenolic antioxidants than most foods. Flavonoids
including catechin
epicatechin
and procyanidins predominate in antioxidant activity. The tricyclic structure of the flavonoids determines antioxidant effects that scavenge reactive oxygen species
chelate Fe2+ and Cu+
inhibit enzymes
and upregulate antioxidant defenses. The epicatechin content of cocoa is primarily responsible for its favorable impact on vascular endothelium via its effect on both acute and chronic upregulation of nitric oxide production. Other cardiovascular effects are mediated through anti-inflammatory effects of cocoa polyphenols
and modulated through the activity of NF-κB. Antioxidant effects of cocoa may directly influence insulin resistance and
in turn
reduce risk for diabetes. Further
cocoa consumption may stimulate changes in redox-sensitive signaling pathways involved in gene expression and the immune response. Cocoa can protect nerves from injury and inflammation
protect the skin from oxidative damage from UV radiation in topical preparations
and have beneficial effects on satiety
cognitive function
and mood. As cocoa is predominantly consumed as energy-dense chocolate
potential detrimental effects of overconsumption exist
including increased risk of weight gain. Overall
research to date suggests that the benefits of moderate cocoa or dark chocolate consumption likely outweigh the risks.
Cocoa and chocolate in human health and disease
Judith A. Treu
Suparna Dutta
John Millet
Valentine Yanchou Njike
Yingying Ma (first author)
OBJECTIVE: \n\nTo determine the effects of daily walnut consumption on endothelial function
cardiovascular biomarkers
and anthropometric measures in type 2 diabetic individuals.\n\nRESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: \n\nThis study was a randomized
controlled
single-blind
crossover trial. Twenty-four participants with type 2 diabetes (mean age 58 years; 14 women and 10 men) were randomly assigned to one of the two possible sequence permutations to receive an ad libitum diet enriched with 56 g (366 kcal) walnuts/day and an ad libitum diet without walnuts for 8 weeks. Subjects underwent endothelial function testing (measured as flow-mediated dilatation [FMD]) and assessment of cardiovascular biomarkers before and after each 8-week treatment phase. The primary outcome measure was the change in FMD after 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included changes in plasma lipids
A1C
fasting glucose
insulin sensitivity
and anthropometric measures.\n\nRESULTS: \n\nEndothelial function significantly improved after consumption of a walnut-enriched ad libitum diet compared with that after consumption of an ad libitum diet without walnuts (2.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.2 +/- 1.6%; P = 0.04). The walnut-enriched diet increased fasting serum glucose and lowered serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol from baseline (10.0 +/- 20.5 mg/dl
P = 0.04; -9.7 +/- 14.5 mg/dl
P < 0.01; and -7.7 +/- 10 mg/dl
P < 0.01
respectively)
although these changes were not significant compared with those for an ad libitum diet without walnuts. There were no significant changes in anthropometric measures
plasma A1C
and insulin sensitivity.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: \n\nA walnut-enriched ad libitum diet improves endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in type 2 diabetic individuals
suggesting a potential reduction in overall cardiac risk.\n
Effects of walnut consumption on endothelial function in type 2 diabetic subjects: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
Yingying Ma
Valentine Yanchou Njike
Jesse Reynolds
Anna Davidhi (first author)
Background: The frequency of unhealthful snacking has increased dramatically over the last three decades. Fruits and nuts have been shown to have positive health effects. No study has investigated the aggregate effects of various fruits combined with nuts in the form of snack bars on cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of this randomised trial was to investigate the effects of a fruit and nut snack bar on anthropomorphic measures
lipid panel and blood pressure in overweight adults. Methods: Ninety-four overweight adults (body mass index > 25 kg m(-2) ) were randomly assigned to add two fruit and nut bars totalling 1421.9 kJ (340 kcal) to their ad libitum diet (intervention group) or to continue with their ad libitum diet (control group). Subjects underwent assessment for weight (primary outcome measure)
as well as waist circumference
lipid panel and blood pressure (secondary outcome measures)
before and at the end of the 8-week treatment. Results: Weight did not change from baseline after snack bar addition compared to controls (P = 0.44). Waist circumference (P = 0.69)
blood pressure (systolic
P = 0.83; diastolic
P = 0.79) and blood lipid panel (total cholesterol
P = 0.72; high-density lipoprotein
P = 0.11; total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein
P = 0.37; triglycerides
P = 0.89; low-density lipoprotein
P = 0.81) also did not change from baseline compared to controls. Conclusions: Two daily fruit and nut bars
totalling 1421.9 kJ (340 kcal)
did not cause weight gain. The role of habitual snacking on nutrient dense and satiating foods on both weight over time
and diet quality
warrants further study. Satiating snacks rich in fibre may provide a means to weight stabilisation.
The effect of the addition of daily fruit and nut bars to diet on weight and cardiac risk profile in overweight adults.
Valentine Y. Njike
Effects of a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based immersion obesity treatment program for adolescents on weight
fitness
and cardiovascular risk factors: a pilot study.
Valentine Njike
Judy Treu
American Journal of Health Promotion
Advancing School and Community Engagement Now for Disease Prevention (ASCEND): A Quasi-experimental Trial of School-Based Interventions to Prevent Childhood Obesity.
Lindiwe Sibeko
Jing Qian
Katherine W. Reeves
Barriers to Exclusive Breastfeeding among Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the U.S.
Doughty
Sacred Heart University
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Southern Connecticut State University
Southern Connecticut State University Department of Public Health
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
One River Grants
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Fairfield University
Fairfield University
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Derby
CT
Designed and implemented evaluation plans for a nutrition guidance intervention in school cafeterias\nAssisted with protocol design for clinical studies\nDrafted original research manuscripts\nAssisted with writing research grant proposals
Research Associate
Taught undergraduate and graduate courses in the Department of Public Health
Southern Connecticut State University
Research Assistant
Managed research studies\nImplemented recruitment activities\nWrote and edited research manuscripts \nAssisted with writing and editing portions of grant proposals\nActed as liaison to Griffin Hospital's Institutional Review Board\nDocumented
collected
and entered data for analysis\nConducted nutrition analyses on diet records\nProvided nutritional consultation to study participants
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Research Associate
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Grant Writer
One River Grants
Teaching Assistant
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Adjunct Professor
Sacred Heart University
Research Scientist
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Adjunct Professor
Southern Connecticut State University Department of Public Health
American Society for Nutrition (ASN)
Member