Danny Yeager

 Danny Yeager

Danny Yeager

  • Courses2
  • Reviews2

Biography

Texas A&M University College Station - Chemistry



Experience

  • Department of Chemistry - Texas A&M University

    Professor

    Danny worked at Department of Chemistry - Texas A&M University as a Professor

  • Texas A&M University

    Professors

    Chemistry Professor specializing in theoretical chemistry.

  • Indian Institute of Tecnology

    Visiting Professor

    Danny worked at Indian Institute of Tecnology as a Visiting Professor

Education

  • California Institute of Technology

    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

    Theoretical Chemistry

  • University of Iowa

    Bachelor of Science (BS) and BA

    Chemistry, Physics and Mathematics

  • University of Chicago

    Post doctorate

    Theoretical Chemistry

Publications

  • Modification of optimal complete active space choices for the multiconfigurational spin-tensor electron propagator method for ionization potentials

    International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

    The multiconfigurational spin tensor electron propagator (MCSTEP) method was developed as an implementation of electron propagator/single particle Green's function methods. MCSTEP was specifically designed for open-shell and highly correlated (nondynamically correlated) initial states. Ionization or electron attachment is always from a state of pure spin symmetry to a state of pure spin symmetry even if the initial state is open shell. MCSTEP can be used as well for molecules with initial states that can be accurately described by a single determinant-based theory. The initial state that is used in MCSTEP is typically a small complete active space (CAS) multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) state. We previously examined different small CAS choices for MCSTEP initial states and have developed a generally workable scheme. This article further examines some different ways to choose the CAS for MCSTEP. With several logical CAS choices, we have calculated the low-lying vertical MCSTEP ionization potentials (IPs) of C2, N2, linear H2O, O2, CH2, and NH2, comparing them with large multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) calculations. We conclude that generally a small modification and extension of our previous schemes for choosing the MCSTEP CAS gives IPs that most effectively mimics the results of large scale MRCI IPs in general.