Queen's University Kingston - Accounting
Professor of Accounting at Stephen JR Smith School of Business at Queen's University
Accounting
Daniel
Thornton
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Daniel B. Thornton, PhD, FCPA, FCA (Ontario), FCPA, FCA (Alberta)
Daniel Thornton is Professor of Accounting at the Stephen J. R. Smith School of Business, Queen’s University. In 2017, he completed a twelve-year appointment as the Chartered Accountants of Ontario Professor at Queen's University. He is currently one of five members of the Minister of National Revenue's Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee and recently completed a nine-year stint as a voting member of the Accounting Standards Oversight Council. He has served as a full-time Professional Accounting Fellow at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC, an editor of The Accounting Review (the journal of the American Accounting Association), an editor of Contemporary Accounting Research (the journal of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association), and a voting member of the Canadian Accounting Standards Board. For his research and educational contributions to the accounting discipline, he has received both the Distinguished Contribution to Accounting Thought Award and the Outstanding Educator Award from the Canadian Academic Accounting Association. A Fellow of the Institutes of Chartered Accountants of both Ontario and Alberta, he has provided extensive expert accounting testimony to various courts and to the Senate of Canada.
President
Daniel worked at Canadian Academic Accounting Association as a President
Editor, Contemporary Accounting Research
Daniel worked at Canadian Academic Accounting Association as a Editor, Contemporary Accounting Research
Professor of Accounting
Research in financial accounting; supervision of graduate students.
Member, Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee (Minister of National Revenue)
The mandate of the Committee is to provide advice, input and recommendations to the Minister and the Canada Revenue Agency on administration, policies, procedures and priorities for offshore compliance with Canada’s tax laws. The scope includes both businesses and high net worth individuals.
Chartered Accountants of Ontario Professorship
Research, teaching, and supervision of doctoral students.
Consulting Editor
Daniel worked at Contemporary Accounting Research as a Consulting Editor
Oversees accounting standard setting in Canada
Chartered Accountant
Accounting and Finance
Distinguished Service Award
Fellow of the Chartered Accountants of Alberta
Chartered Accountant
Accounting
Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Financial Economics
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
This article proposes a way of accounting for firms’ social responsibilities as constructive obligations under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, thereby exposing certain limitations of financial accounting, given its current conceptual framework.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
This article proposes a way of accounting for firms’ social responsibilities as constructive obligations under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, thereby exposing certain limitations of financial accounting, given its current conceptual framework.
Accounting Perspectives
We hypothesize and find that firms making SOX-mandated disclosures of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) exhibit lower investor-perceived earnings quality (IPEQ) than nondisclosers. We measure IPEQ using e-loading, a market-returns–based representation of earnings quality developed by Ecker, Francis, Kim, Olsson, and Schipper (2006). Firms do not exhibit decreases in IPEQ after initially disclosing material weaknesses. This is consistent with investors having anticipated ICOFR strength based on observable firm characteristics. However, firms exhibit increases in IPEQ after receiving their first clean audit reports that confirm the remediation of previously disclosed weaknesses. This indicates that, although investors do not find initial weakness disclosures to be incrementally informative, SOX motivates firms to remediate weak controls and provides a venue for credible remediation disclosures, thus enhancing investors’ perception of financial reporting reliability. These findings are consistent with the existence of regulatory benefits associated with SOX’s internal control disclosure and audit requirements.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
This article proposes a way of accounting for firms’ social responsibilities as constructive obligations under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, thereby exposing certain limitations of financial accounting, given its current conceptual framework.
Accounting Perspectives
We hypothesize and find that firms making SOX-mandated disclosures of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) exhibit lower investor-perceived earnings quality (IPEQ) than nondisclosers. We measure IPEQ using e-loading, a market-returns–based representation of earnings quality developed by Ecker, Francis, Kim, Olsson, and Schipper (2006). Firms do not exhibit decreases in IPEQ after initially disclosing material weaknesses. This is consistent with investors having anticipated ICOFR strength based on observable firm characteristics. However, firms exhibit increases in IPEQ after receiving their first clean audit reports that confirm the remediation of previously disclosed weaknesses. This indicates that, although investors do not find initial weakness disclosures to be incrementally informative, SOX motivates firms to remediate weak controls and provides a venue for credible remediation disclosures, thus enhancing investors’ perception of financial reporting reliability. These findings are consistent with the existence of regulatory benefits associated with SOX’s internal control disclosure and audit requirements.
Different Conceptual Accounting Frameworks for Public and Private Enterprises: Commentary on Canada’s IFRS Transition and Suggestions for International Empirical Work
Prior research, coupled with demographic data relating to the needs of financial statement users, suggests that Canada’s strategy of adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for public firms, while simultaneously basing Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) on a classic conceptual framework featuring reliability, conservatism and verifiability, is a rational strategy that confers a comparative advantage on Canada’s private enterprises relative to their peers in other countries. I propose research projects that could examine this inference as a testable hypothesis, thereby providing empirical evidence that standard setters could weigh in determining whether the strategy is successful and worth preserving. I also explain why conservatism can co-exist with unbiased fair values of private enterprises’ equity securities and their derivatives.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
This article proposes a way of accounting for firms’ social responsibilities as constructive obligations under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, thereby exposing certain limitations of financial accounting, given its current conceptual framework.
Accounting Perspectives
We hypothesize and find that firms making SOX-mandated disclosures of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) exhibit lower investor-perceived earnings quality (IPEQ) than nondisclosers. We measure IPEQ using e-loading, a market-returns–based representation of earnings quality developed by Ecker, Francis, Kim, Olsson, and Schipper (2006). Firms do not exhibit decreases in IPEQ after initially disclosing material weaknesses. This is consistent with investors having anticipated ICOFR strength based on observable firm characteristics. However, firms exhibit increases in IPEQ after receiving their first clean audit reports that confirm the remediation of previously disclosed weaknesses. This indicates that, although investors do not find initial weakness disclosures to be incrementally informative, SOX motivates firms to remediate weak controls and provides a venue for credible remediation disclosures, thus enhancing investors’ perception of financial reporting reliability. These findings are consistent with the existence of regulatory benefits associated with SOX’s internal control disclosure and audit requirements.
Different Conceptual Accounting Frameworks for Public and Private Enterprises: Commentary on Canada’s IFRS Transition and Suggestions for International Empirical Work
Prior research, coupled with demographic data relating to the needs of financial statement users, suggests that Canada’s strategy of adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for public firms, while simultaneously basing Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) on a classic conceptual framework featuring reliability, conservatism and verifiability, is a rational strategy that confers a comparative advantage on Canada’s private enterprises relative to their peers in other countries. I propose research projects that could examine this inference as a testable hypothesis, thereby providing empirical evidence that standard setters could weigh in determining whether the strategy is successful and worth preserving. I also explain why conservatism can co-exist with unbiased fair values of private enterprises’ equity securities and their derivatives.
Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting
We review and synthesize the results of empirical studies of associations between corporate oversight measures and financial reporting quality (FRQ). We examine two oversight components, board characteristics and audit committee characteristics. For each component, we summarize associations between variables contributing to monitoring effectiveness and three presumptive FRQ monitoring outcomes: (1) ex post consequences of low FRQ, such as financial reporting fraud; (2) earnings management measures, such as abnormal accruals; and (3) perceived informativeness of financial reports, manifest in earnings-returns associations, earnings response coefficients, and analyst perceptions of FRQ. Our classification scheme provides a coherent framework for synthesizing the implications of empirical findings, highlighting the role of different corporate governance variables in enhancing different aspects of FRQ. This synthesis has the potential to inform regulators, boards of directors, and forensic accountants who are concerned with improving the oversight of public corporations and reducing opportunities for managers and others to engage in financial fraud.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
This article proposes a way of accounting for firms’ social responsibilities as constructive obligations under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, thereby exposing certain limitations of financial accounting, given its current conceptual framework.
Accounting Perspectives
We hypothesize and find that firms making SOX-mandated disclosures of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) exhibit lower investor-perceived earnings quality (IPEQ) than nondisclosers. We measure IPEQ using e-loading, a market-returns–based representation of earnings quality developed by Ecker, Francis, Kim, Olsson, and Schipper (2006). Firms do not exhibit decreases in IPEQ after initially disclosing material weaknesses. This is consistent with investors having anticipated ICOFR strength based on observable firm characteristics. However, firms exhibit increases in IPEQ after receiving their first clean audit reports that confirm the remediation of previously disclosed weaknesses. This indicates that, although investors do not find initial weakness disclosures to be incrementally informative, SOX motivates firms to remediate weak controls and provides a venue for credible remediation disclosures, thus enhancing investors’ perception of financial reporting reliability. These findings are consistent with the existence of regulatory benefits associated with SOX’s internal control disclosure and audit requirements.
Different Conceptual Accounting Frameworks for Public and Private Enterprises: Commentary on Canada’s IFRS Transition and Suggestions for International Empirical Work
Prior research, coupled with demographic data relating to the needs of financial statement users, suggests that Canada’s strategy of adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for public firms, while simultaneously basing Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) on a classic conceptual framework featuring reliability, conservatism and verifiability, is a rational strategy that confers a comparative advantage on Canada’s private enterprises relative to their peers in other countries. I propose research projects that could examine this inference as a testable hypothesis, thereby providing empirical evidence that standard setters could weigh in determining whether the strategy is successful and worth preserving. I also explain why conservatism can co-exist with unbiased fair values of private enterprises’ equity securities and their derivatives.
Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting
We review and synthesize the results of empirical studies of associations between corporate oversight measures and financial reporting quality (FRQ). We examine two oversight components, board characteristics and audit committee characteristics. For each component, we summarize associations between variables contributing to monitoring effectiveness and three presumptive FRQ monitoring outcomes: (1) ex post consequences of low FRQ, such as financial reporting fraud; (2) earnings management measures, such as abnormal accruals; and (3) perceived informativeness of financial reports, manifest in earnings-returns associations, earnings response coefficients, and analyst perceptions of FRQ. Our classification scheme provides a coherent framework for synthesizing the implications of empirical findings, highlighting the role of different corporate governance variables in enhancing different aspects of FRQ. This synthesis has the potential to inform regulators, boards of directors, and forensic accountants who are concerned with improving the oversight of public corporations and reducing opportunities for managers and others to engage in financial fraud.