Awesome
Great professor, and even the class was very heavy on the lecturing, she made it simple and was always willing to help. Wants students to do well, and if you study you will.
Good
Prof. Sandberg clearly knows her stuff. She gives 5 quizzes and 5 exams, one of which gets dropped. I suggest showing up in class and taking notes along with her powerpoints.
Pennsylvania State University - Communication Disorders
Genesis Healthcare System
Penn State College of Health and Human Development
Boston University
Genesis Healthcare System
Assistant Professor
Penn State College of Health and Human Development
Student
Research Assistant
Studied Speech Language Pathology with a focus in aphasia.\n\nResearch:\nMaster's Thesis -- Examined abstractness as a form of complexity in a generative word-finding treatment based on the Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy. \n\nStudied the differential patterns of neural activation of abstract and concrete word processing in healthy older adults using fMRI. \n\nWorked with Drs. Risto Miikkulainen
Uli Grasemann
and Swathi Kiran on a project aimed at developing and evaluating a computational model of language processing in bilingual aphasia.
The University of Texas at Austin
PhD Student
Research Assistant
Lecturer
Lab Manager
Research:\nExamining neuroplasticity related to theory-based treatment in persons with aphasia using fMRI.\n\nCompared abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia with healthy older adults.\n \nWorked with Drs. Kiran
Caplan
and Waters on a sentence comprehension treatment study
assisting in the development of stimuli and treatment procedures
as well as recruiting and treating patients.\n\nWorked with Drs. Kiran
Gibson
and Fedorenko examining the effect of plausibility on sentence comprehension in aphasia.\n\nLecturer:\nCognition and Neural Bases in Fall 2011\n\nGuest Lecturer:\nCognition and Neural Bases (various topics Fall 2009 and 2010)\nModels of Language Processing Across the Lifespan: Semantics (Fall 2009)\nLanguage and the Brain (various topics Fall/Spring 2008-2009)\n\nLab Manager:\nTrained students in the lab on policies and procedures
including how to test and treat patients and how to analyze behavioral and fMRI data. \nHelped develop a lab wiki to streamline training and establish protocols.\nRan day-to-day operations of the lab
Boston University
Cognitive Neuroscience Society
Academy of Aphasia
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Organization for Human Brain Mapping
Ph.D.
Speech Language and Hearing Sciences
Boston University
M.A.
Speech Language Pathology
The University of Texas at Austin
National Student Speech Language Hearing Association
Boston University
Dudley Allen Sargent Research Fund Award
Boston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Donna R. Fox Scholarship
Texas Speech-Language and Hearing Foundation
Dudley Allen Sargent Research Fund Award
Boston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
F31 Fellowship: Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award
NIH NIDCD
B.A.
Linguistics
Communication Sciences and Disorders
NSSLHA - UT chapter
publicity chair
The University of Texas at Austin
Boston University Conference on Language Development
session chair
abstract reviewer
Research Assistant
In Dr. Richard Meier’s lab with Dr. Ginger Pizer
I assisted in the examination of sign modification and joint attention of Deaf parents and their children during the acquisition of American Sign Language by analyzing and coding videos of the interactions between Deaf parents and their children. This work was published in Sign Language Studies.\n\nIn Dr. Ron Gillam’s lab with Dr. Maya Clark
I assisted in the exploration of dialect use and dialect change in children with specific language impairment who speak African American English
by analyzing and coding the utterances of several children with specific language impairment who speak African American English.
The University of Texas at Austin
Research
Neurophysiology
fMRI
Statistics
Treatment
Neuropsychology
Language Processing
Writing
Aphasia
SPSS
Psychology
Microsoft Office
Language Disorders
Clinical
Rehabilitation
Data Analysis
Cognitive Neuroscience
PowerPoint
Neuroimaging
Teaching
Analysis of abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia and age-matched neurologically healthy adults using fMRI
The concreteness effect occurs in both normal and language-disordered populations. Research suggests that abstract and concrete concepts elicit differing neural activation patterns in healthy young adults
but this is undocumented in persons with aphasia (PWA). Three PWA and three age-matched controls were scanned using fMRI while processing abstract and concrete words. Consistent with current theories of abstract and concrete word processing
abstract words elicited activation in verbal areas
whereas concrete words additionally activated multimodal association areas. PWA show greater differences in neural activation than age-matched controls between abstract and concrete words
possibly due to an exaggerated concreteness effect.
Analysis of abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia and age-matched neurologically healthy adults using fMRI
Rajani Sebastian
Background\nThe typicality effect is present in neurologically intact populations for natural
ad-hoc
and well-defined categories. Although sparse
there is evidence of typicality effects in persons with chronic stroke aphasia for natural and ad-hoc categories. However
it is unknown exactly what influences the typicality effect in this population.\nAims\nThe present study explores the possible contributors to the typicality effect in persons with aphasia by analyzing and comparing data from both normal and language-disordered populations
from persons with aphasia with more semantic impairment versus those with less semantic impairment
and from two types of categories with very different boundary structure (ad-hoc vs. well-defined).\nMethods and procedures\nA total of 40 neurologically healthy adults (20 older
20 younger) and 35 persons with aphasia (20 LSI (less-semantically impaired) patients
15 MSI (more-semantically impaired) patients) participated in the study. Participants completed one of two tasks: either category verification for ad-hoc categories or category verification for well-defined categories.\nOutcomes and results\nNeurologically healthy participants showed typicality effects for both ad-hoc and well-defined categories. MSI patients showed a typicality effect for well-defined categories
but not for ad-hoc categories
whereas LSI patients showed a typicality effect for ad-hoc categories
but not for well-defined categories.\nConclusions\nThese results suggest that the degree of semantic impairment mediates the typicality effect in persons with aphasia depending on the structure of the category.
Typicality Mediates Performance during Category Verification in Both Ad-hoc and Well-defined Categories
Sandberg
The University of Texas at Austin