Chaleece Sandberg

 ChaleeceW. Sandberg

Chaleece W. Sandberg

  • Courses3
  • Reviews8
May 3, 2018
N/A
Textbook used: No
Would take again: Yes
For Credit: Yes

0
0


Mandatory



Difficulty
Clarity
Helpfulness

Awesome

Great professor, and even the class was very heavy on the lecturing, she made it simple and was always willing to help. Wants students to do well, and if you study you will.

Apr 26, 2018
N/A
Textbook used: No
Would take again: Yes
For Credit: Yes

0
0


Mandatory



Difficulty
Clarity
Helpfulness

Good

Prof. Sandberg clearly knows her stuff. She gives 5 quizzes and 5 exams, one of which gets dropped. I suggest showing up in class and taking notes along with her powerpoints.

Biography

Pennsylvania State University - Communication Disorders


Resume

  • 2014

    Genesis Healthcare System

    Penn State College of Health and Human Development

    Boston University

    Genesis Healthcare System

    Assistant Professor

    Penn State College of Health and Human Development

    Student

    Research Assistant

    Studied Speech Language Pathology with a focus in aphasia.\n\nResearch:\nMaster's Thesis -- Examined abstractness as a form of complexity in a generative word-finding treatment based on the Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy. \n\nStudied the differential patterns of neural activation of abstract and concrete word processing in healthy older adults using fMRI. \n\nWorked with Drs. Risto Miikkulainen

    Uli Grasemann

    and Swathi Kiran on a project aimed at developing and evaluating a computational model of language processing in bilingual aphasia.

    The University of Texas at Austin

    PhD Student

    Research Assistant

    Lecturer

    Lab Manager

    Research:\nExamining neuroplasticity related to theory-based treatment in persons with aphasia using fMRI.\n\nCompared abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia with healthy older adults.\n \nWorked with Drs. Kiran

    Caplan

    and Waters on a sentence comprehension treatment study

    assisting in the development of stimuli and treatment procedures

    as well as recruiting and treating patients.\n\nWorked with Drs. Kiran

    Gibson

    and Fedorenko examining the effect of plausibility on sentence comprehension in aphasia.\n\nLecturer:\nCognition and Neural Bases in Fall 2011\n\nGuest Lecturer:\nCognition and Neural Bases (various topics Fall 2009 and 2010)\nModels of Language Processing Across the Lifespan: Semantics (Fall 2009)\nLanguage and the Brain (various topics Fall/Spring 2008-2009)\n\nLab Manager:\nTrained students in the lab on policies and procedures

    including how to test and treat patients and how to analyze behavioral and fMRI data. \nHelped develop a lab wiki to streamline training and establish protocols.\nRan day-to-day operations of the lab

    Boston University

    Cognitive Neuroscience Society

    Academy of Aphasia

    American Speech Language Hearing Association

    Organization for Human Brain Mapping

  • 2009

    Ph.D.

    Speech Language and Hearing Sciences

    Boston University

  • 2006

    M.A.

    Speech Language Pathology

    The University of Texas at Austin

  • 2005

    National Student Speech Language Hearing Association

    Boston University

    Dudley Allen Sargent Research Fund Award

    Boston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

    Donna R. Fox Scholarship

    Texas Speech-Language and Hearing Foundation

    Dudley Allen Sargent Research Fund Award

    Boston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

    F31 Fellowship: Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award

    NIH NIDCD

  • 2004

    B.A.

    Linguistics

    Communication Sciences and Disorders

    NSSLHA - UT chapter

    publicity chair

    The University of Texas at Austin

  • Boston University Conference on Language Development

    session chair

    abstract reviewer

    Research Assistant

    In Dr. Richard Meier’s lab with Dr. Ginger Pizer

    I assisted in the examination of sign modification and joint attention of Deaf parents and their children during the acquisition of American Sign Language by analyzing and coding videos of the interactions between Deaf parents and their children. This work was published in Sign Language Studies.\n\nIn Dr. Ron Gillam’s lab with Dr. Maya Clark

    I assisted in the exploration of dialect use and dialect change in children with specific language impairment who speak African American English

    by analyzing and coding the utterances of several children with specific language impairment who speak African American English.

    The University of Texas at Austin

    Research

    Neurophysiology

    fMRI

    Statistics

    Treatment

    Neuropsychology

    Language Processing

    Writing

    Aphasia

    SPSS

    Psychology

    Microsoft Office

    Language Disorders

    Clinical

    Rehabilitation

    Data Analysis

    Cognitive Neuroscience

    PowerPoint

    Neuroimaging

    Teaching

    Analysis of abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia and age-matched neurologically healthy adults using fMRI

    The concreteness effect occurs in both normal and language-disordered populations. Research suggests that abstract and concrete concepts elicit differing neural activation patterns in healthy young adults

    but this is undocumented in persons with aphasia (PWA). Three PWA and three age-matched controls were scanned using fMRI while processing abstract and concrete words. Consistent with current theories of abstract and concrete word processing

    abstract words elicited activation in verbal areas

    whereas concrete words additionally activated multimodal association areas. PWA show greater differences in neural activation than age-matched controls between abstract and concrete words

    possibly due to an exaggerated concreteness effect.

    Analysis of abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia and age-matched neurologically healthy adults using fMRI

    Rajani Sebastian

    Background\nThe typicality effect is present in neurologically intact populations for natural

    ad-hoc

    and well-defined categories. Although sparse

    there is evidence of typicality effects in persons with chronic stroke aphasia for natural and ad-hoc categories. However

    it is unknown exactly what influences the typicality effect in this population.\nAims\nThe present study explores the possible contributors to the typicality effect in persons with aphasia by analyzing and comparing data from both normal and language-disordered populations

    from persons with aphasia with more semantic impairment versus those with less semantic impairment

    and from two types of categories with very different boundary structure (ad-hoc vs. well-defined).\nMethods and procedures\nA total of 40 neurologically healthy adults (20 older

    20 younger) and 35 persons with aphasia (20 LSI (less-semantically impaired) patients

    15 MSI (more-semantically impaired) patients) participated in the study. Participants completed one of two tasks: either category verification for ad-hoc categories or category verification for well-defined categories.\nOutcomes and results\nNeurologically healthy participants showed typicality effects for both ad-hoc and well-defined categories. MSI patients showed a typicality effect for well-defined categories

    but not for ad-hoc categories

    whereas LSI patients showed a typicality effect for ad-hoc categories

    but not for well-defined categories.\nConclusions\nThese results suggest that the degree of semantic impairment mediates the typicality effect in persons with aphasia depending on the structure of the category.

    Typicality Mediates Performance during Category Verification in Both Ad-hoc and Well-defined Categories

    Sandberg

    The University of Texas at Austin

CSD 331

3.2(6)