Bryan Wiebe

 Bryan Wiebe

Bryan Wiebe

  • Courses5
  • Reviews13

Biography

University of Saskatchewan - Philosophy


Resume

  • 1989

    University of Saskatchewan

    Saskatchewan

    Canada

    St. Thomas More Faculty Union

    Saskatoon

    Saskatchewan

    Lecturing in Philosophy

    Sessional Lecturer

    St. Thomas More College

    Lecturing in Philosophy. Setting and grading philosophy exams. Grading philosophy papers. Researching in philosophy. Writing and presenting philosophy papers.

    St. Thomas More College

    Saskatoon

    Saskatchewa

    Lecturing in Philosophy

    Sessional Lecturer

    University of Saskatchewan

    Canadian Philosophical Association

  • 1981

    Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

    Philosophy

    University of Alberta

  • 1980

    Master's degree

    Philosophy

    University of Alberta

  • 1976

    Bachelor of Arts (B.A.)

    Philosophy

    University of Saskatchewan - St. Thomas More College

    Bachelor of Arts (B.A. Hon.)

    Philosophy

    University of Saskatchewan

  • labor relations

    bargaining and book-keeping

    St. Thomas More Faculty Union

    Adult Education

    Lecturing

    Union Treasurer

    Academic Writing

    Editing

    Higher Education

    Qualitative Research

    Teaching

    Research

    University Teaching

    Collective Bargaining

    Curriculum Development

    Unavoidable Blameworthiness

    The Kantian ethical position

    especially as represented in Alan Donagan

    rejects the possibility of unavoidable blameworthiness. Donagan also holds that morality is learned by participation. But consider: there must be some first instance of an agent’s being held blameworthy. To hold the agent blameworthy in that instance supposes that the agent could have known what morality required so as to be able to avoid blameworthiness. But before experiencing blameworthiness the agent can have no real understanding of the significance of morality’s requiring anything

    if morality is learned by participation. Hence the agent could not have known to avoid violating morality’s requirement. The agent could not have knowingly avoided being blameworthy in the first instance of blameworthiness

    as he or she would not understand the significance of doing so. This is unavoidable blameworthiness

    Unavoidable Blameworthiness

    Bryan

    Wiebe Ph.D.

    St. Thomas More College

    St. Thomas More Faculty Union

PHIL 110

2.4(5)

PHIL 140

1.9(5)